10 / 10
Former Prince Andrew challenges search warrants
The court will examine whether police lawfully obtained warrants used before Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Epstein-linked arrest.
What happened
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has asked London’s High Court to quash search warrants used at two homes before his February arrest. He was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office over allegations that he leaked government documents to Jeffrey Epstein. Thames Valley Police confirmed it is involved in the proceedings; a private hearing is scheduled Thursday.
Numbers
- 2 homesProperties covered by the warrants
- 11 hoursTime police questioned him
- 2001–2011His period as trade representative
Questions
- What could a court win change?
- A ruling for him could prevent prosecutors using material found in the searches in any later prosecution, a legal expert said.
- Why use judicial review?
- His application seeks review of warrants issued by the Central Criminal Court, rather than a decision on his guilt.
- How long was he held?
- Police questioned Mountbatten-Windsor for 11 hours after the February arrest before releasing him under investigation, accounts of the detention stated.
- What role is at issue?
- The allegations concern his time as the UK’s trade representative, a role he held from 2001 to 2011.
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
The catch
The court has not ruled on the warrants, and no charge against Mountbatten-Windsor is described in the coverage.